Romanticism Poem and the Concept of Mercy

The creation of lenity send away be a very hard social function for one to grasp. One may find themselves asking Whom sh every last(predicate) be prone mercy? , and How some(prenominal) mercy should be guiden? . There is no decided answer to those questions as mercy can be shown in various ways. There are three particular whole kit and boodle that emphasize the innovation of mercy, each screening a diametrical perspective. The three works that use very distinctive ways to show mercy are The merc pass awayiser of Venice, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, and Verses Upon the Burning of our House.All of the themes of these works are much a wish, as they all involve the comparison of mercy to a spectacular causality. However, there are a few distinctions among the works. In The Merchant of Venice, by William Shakespeare, the causality uses a particular caption in the play to show how the concept of mercy should be perceived. Shakespeare shows the concepts of mercy b y explaining how powerful mercy. Shakespeare shows this by stating, It is an attribute to God himself, (IV. i. 193) thus saying that God uses mercy and so should everyone else.In the narrative Versus Upon the Burning of our House, the author, Anne Bradstreet, berates roughly the merciful God, and how he has relieve her from end. She writes about how she has become too materialistic and how her merciful God has helped her in her time of need. This can be shown when the author writes, And to my God my heart did bellyache/To straighten me in my distress, (8-9) In Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, Jonathan Edwards writes about the Mercy of God as well. His account differs from Bradstreets a little, as he is talking about how God is the reason for everyone living.He says that if it were not for a merciful God, then no one would be living. This can be supported by the author stating, It is nothing but His mere entertainment that keeps you from being this moment swallowed up in ev erlasting destruction, (56) Even though these works have divers(prenominal) variations of the concept of mercy, the overall theme is the power of mercy is unending. All three of these works demonstrate that mercy can be used in many incompatible ways and divers(prenominal) amounts. Although, as stated before, the theme is mostly the same over all the works, the tone is very different. to each one of these works have their own clear-cut tones. Shakespeare takes on the tone of appreciation. While reading the transportation, reviewers observe Shakespeare appreciating mercy and all its glory. Shakespeare writes, It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven, (IV. i. 185) giving the reader the illustration that mercy is very plentiful and gentle. Countless times throughout the passage Shakespeare speaks of the power of mercy and just how wonderful it is. As for Bradstreet and Edwards, they take on totally different tones. Bradstreets tone is thankfulness of mercy.The author comes acros s within the passage as being very thankful for Gods mercy and how she would be mixed-up without it. This can be proving by the following quote, I blest his coldcock that gave and took,/That laid my goods now in the dust. (14-15) This is a prime example of the author thanking God for having mercy and helping her rather than punishing her. Both Shakespeare and Bradstreet talk about what can happen when mercy is present. Edwards on the other hand talks about what will happen without mercy. Edwards describes violent and vivid images of destruction in his writing.All of which can happen without the mercy of God. He speaks of how you should fear the absence seizure of mercy saying, Your wickedness makes you as it were heavy as lead, and to tend downward(prenominal) with great weight and pressure towards hell and if God should let you go, you would forthwith sink and swiftly descend and plunge into the bottomless gulf. (56) everyplace all, mercy is said to be praised for its presen ce, and feared for its absence. The authors use multiple ways of showing their own perspective on the concept of mercy.The three authors uses of literary devices in their works help strongly support their stems on the concept of mercy. For instance, Shakespeare uses a simile that compares mercy as being better than a pinnacle for a king. He writes, It becomes the throned monarch better than his crown. This simile backs up the idea of mercy being powerful, and it can be the most powerful in those with the most power. Bradstreet uses an extended metaphor saying that the burning of her house is like the burning of her sins.She thanks God for saving her from her material things which she feels are a sin. Edwards uses multiple similes and metaphors showings Gods power and how everyone is doomed without him. For instance he writes, The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much a one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fir, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked, giving the reader the understanding that God is unbelievably greater than people. Each writer uses different literary devices to strengthen their views on the concept of mercy, and each is used in a very strategic manner.The concept of mercy can be interpreted by many different people many different ways. There is no set rules of mercy, and it is up for discussion among people. Everyone has their own ideas on how mercy is and should be. Whos idea is right? Well, there is no mistaken or correct way to show mercy. In the three works of literature discussed above, each author has their own interpretation of the concept of mercy. Each work has a very distinctive way of proving their point, and each has a similarities and differences with the other works as to how mercy should be perceived.