A Dolls House Analysis of Nora

A Dolls family unit Analysis of NoraI must carry on my own two feet if I am to find break the truth about myself and about life, To what end is Nora a tragic aceine? -1497 wrangling (excluding title)A Dolls House by Henrik Ibsen is a modern catastrophe that is centred just about the life of a typical Norwegian household in the straightlaced era, focusing on the trials and tribulations that face Nora Helmer in this patriarchal society. A Dolls House explores not only the status of women, scarce how they are victims of social forces to the extent that they are left with the role of a dollwife. During the course of this essay, I think to study the character of Nora and to what extent she qualifies as a tragic heroine.As the curtain opens to the first act, we are introduced to Nora as an extravagant light person, a sweet little spendthrift giving the audience the impression that she leave be yet another undeveloped egg-producing(prenominal) character as seen in previous tra ditional tragedies. Ibsen uses patronizing language to portray Torvalds lieu of his wife, how to him she was just a sweet little amuse, the word little show Torvalds misogynistic ego, and how he uses typically loving terms but makes them seem patronising and demeaning.Aristotles description of a tragic hero as outlined in his book Poetics, is where he discusses the aspects of ones character which qualify one to be a tragic hero, ideas which live with been accepted and expanded for several centuries, and often utilize as a mould for tragic heroes. In order to consecrate my conclusion and decide to what degree Nora is a tragic heroine, I exit compare Noras character to whatsoever of the ideas Aristotle discussed in his book.According to Aristotle, the tragic hero is a man who is a mixture of good characteristics and atrocious characteristics. disregarding of the requirement of being male, Nora fits this aspect of his definition perfectly as she back end be seen as both the epitome of good and evil at bottom the play, depending on ones perspective. Ibsen establishes Noras character as not purely vapid (as we by chance thought based on our first impression of her) but a woman who gave up the necessities of life and went to extreme lengths to save her husbands life, plane though it was considered imprudent in Victorian society, where a woman was transferred from being, firstly a good daughter, secondly a good wife and finally a good mother. Consequently, Noras character skunk also be seen as having bad characteristics (one of Aristotles prerequisites of being a tragic hero) as she undoubtedly committed a finesse and as Krogstad says, the law cares nothing about motives, however if Nora did it for loves sake. Ibsen stated that a woman cannot be herself in modern society. It is an exclusively male society, with laws make by men with no regard to female emotions.Torvald shakes his finger at Nora and says that a songbird must have a clean nozzle to chirp with. Ibsens use of stage direction clearly shows Torvalds act conduct towards his wife. It also shows that even after eight years of marriage, Torvald Helmer underestimates his wifes character or capabilities to the extent that it is questionable whether he admits her at all. Ibsen suggests that even though the temporary hookup unfolds in a male dominated society, those same men could be easily deceived by their wives, as shown by Torvald and Noras relationship. Even though Ibsen has followed Aristotles idea, he has left it open to interpretation as Noras actions can be interpreted as good or bad.Ibsen portrays Nora as being coquettish, using her truelove and charisma to her advantage as she play(s) with Torvalds coat buttons without raising her eyes to his, spotless domestic, flirtatious behaviour. However, it adds complexity to Noras character, as she is manipulating her husband into giving her what she desires. Alternatively, Ibsen could be portray that women were no w breaking away from the restraints of the social norm, where before all else, they are a wife and a mother. As it is revealed to us that Nora saved Torvalds life, we know that she is not just a dollwife, but a woman of reason complexity. Ibsen adds psychological depth to Noras character, depth that was previously uncommon within female characters in drama, a prime example being Shakespeares Ophelia.The play follows Aristotles blueprint -the tragic hero has a tragic flaw, or hamartia, that is the cause of his downfall-, establishing Nora as a tragic heroine. Nora Helmers tragic flaw is undoubtedly her naivet. As Aristotle stated, the tragedy is usually triggered by some error of judgment or some character flaw and it can be said that it is Noras innocence that needfully leads her to her tragic fall. As I have previously discussed, Torvald consistently displays condescending and demeaning behaviour towards Nora, calling her a little featherhead and an obstinate little person, and Nora seems to perceive his abusive and controlling behaviour as a menage that Torvald is so absurdly fond of her. Nora regards her husband as having no lesson failings, and man enough to take everything upon himself to the extent that he would never for a moment hesitate to give his life for her. Torvalds morality is what makes his actions so awful when he refuses to save her and accuses her of having no religion, no morality, no sense of duty, when in circumstance the reason behind her immorality was Torvald himself. Noras understanding of her hamartia permits her to kitchen range catharsis which is a secular moment of self realisation, allowing her to therefore determine her problem and complete her journey to be a tragic heroine. During set II, Nora starts to realize her flaw, she starts to realize that she is not Torvalds dollwife living in his play room. This is do evident in the play as Nora disagrees with Torvald and says he has a shockable way of looking at things. Even though this realization is nowhere as dramatic as it would have been in classical tragedy, Noras actions have the same effect on the audience as she voices her opinion, taking on the dominant role in their relationship.Aristotle also states that the tragic hero is person people can relate to. Ibsen has made this possible by picture his play within a typical affluent Victorian household, and uses Nora to account the oppression of women, and how they have been dehumanized to mere objects of entertainment, particularly in the bourgeois society. George Bernard Shaw agrees that the plays domestic setting makes the characters recognizable people as their problems were familiar to the audience. Ibsen illustrates the Helmers mixed-up marriage through Nora taking off her fancy dress, her changing into continuous clothing symbolises the shedding of all illusions about their marriage. He uses the metaphor of a cold, wintry night to depict the frosty atmosphere of the Helmer househo ld. Ibsen shows how Nora has existed merely to perform tricks for Torvald through the tarantella, a folk dance that was traditionally performed to purge oneself of poison, showing the intensity of the control Torvald has over her.Finally, Aristotle argues that the tragic hero always falls in the end, and that is why he is called a tragic hero. His tragic flaw always ends up in tragedy for himself and for those around him. The plays climaxes when Nora leaves her husband and children, which can be regarded as her fall. This can be regarded as either an avouchment of her humanity or as a negligence of her most taboo duties, as she forsake(s) her husband and children. However, In my opinion, Nora is not abandoning any duties as even though she had borne Torvald three children, it was their maid Anne-Marie that catered to all the childrens needs, whereas it was great fun when Nora play with the children, the children have been her dolls. Subsequently, it can be seen as liberation for Nora as her consentient life, she was simply transferred from Papas hands to Torvalds, allowing her to make nothing of her life. It is here when our little skylark finally flies away from her cage, attaining freedom. Aristotle agrees that the fall is not pure loss. in that respect is some increase in awareness, some gain in self-knowledge, as Nora slams the door shut on her marriage. It can be said that Ibsen uses his final stage direction to symbolise the possible decline of patriarchy, the closing of nineteenth century beliefs and the birth of Modernism.Throughout the play, Nora takes on many different roles, do her character difficult to compartmentalise, but as a critic says, the superior dramatic characters have the freedom of incongruity. In A Dolls House, Ibsen presents us with a character that at first glance appears to be a featherhead, but follows the Aristotelian journey of a tragic hero, from hamartia to catharsis to her tragic fall. Aristotle says that the tragic h ero is a character of noble stature and has greatness, and even though Nora is just an ordinary Victorian housewife, it is undeniable that she does in fact possess greatness, making Nora a modern tragic heroine.